tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13323795.post6703112649458408599..comments2023-09-19T10:31:04.810-04:00Comments on beloved before time: Piper vs. Wright on JustificationAndrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03215174193221101678noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13323795.post-313719135873031132009-06-30T17:56:25.292-04:002009-06-30T17:56:25.292-04:00Yes, Andrew. I just saw that today at work- the ta...Yes, Andrew. I just saw that today at work- the table. Actually from what I've read of Moo his take would definitely embrace something of the new perspective. <br /><br />I'm afraid though that such a table can be a little misleading; in this case the old wine is better, because that's what we have always drank. There's no substitute for reading the books themselves. <br /><br />At the same time, I think from my glance of it it's a pretty good summary, but not good enough for me- because you just have to do the reading, if you're really going to understand. (I do share your view that Piper is not the best one to defend the old perspective, though I most appreciate his spirit)<br /><br />Good post, and I need to read further on it. I need to turn on my classical music again, with my reading, because as much as I'm finding N.T. Wright's new book on justification fascinating, I keep falling asleep (because I'm tired!).<br /><br />Interesting that your former pastor has an essay there. I liked a few words I picked up from it today.<br /><br />Thanks.Ted M. Gossardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10580691315315271791noreply@blogger.com